News & Updates

Commentary: The $100,000 H-1B Visa Surcharge – Short-Term Political Gains, Long-Term Development Risks
The Trump administration recently announced a $100,000 supplemental fee on top of existing H-1B visa application costs. This move immediately sparked widespread attention. Proponents argue it will boost federal revenue and prevent foreign workers from "taking American jobs"; opponents, however, warn that the policy is a classic example of "short-sightedness" that could undermine America’s long-term competitiveness.
I. Short-Term "Gains"
Fiscal Revenue
Adding $100,000 per H-1B application will undoubtedly generate billions of dollars in substantial revenue for the federal government.
Political Impact
Under the slogan of "Putting American Workers First," the policy caters to the expectations of some voters, appearing to protect local employment.
Restricting Low-Wage Positions
The surcharge may force employers to rethink their use of H-1B visas, reducing reliance on foreign workers for low-paying or entry-level roles.
These short-term "achievements" may deliver immediate political dividends for the administration.
II. Long-Term Negative Consequences
Global Talent Locked Out
The H-1B visa has long been a core tool for the U.S. to attract global talent. The exorbitant surcharge will place an unbearable burden on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and startups, driving many young high-potential talents to more welcoming countries such as Canada, the UK, and Australia.
Erosion of the Innovation Ecosystem
The prosperity of America’s tech industry and innovation hubs (e.g., Silicon Valley, Boston, Austin) relies heavily on international talent. The high surcharge will bar their entry, undermining the U.S.’s competitive edge in technology and entrepreneurship.
Diminished Economic Growth Potential
Immigrants make significant contributions to U.S. GDP growth and job creation. Restricting foreign talent will only weaken overall economic vitality, failing to truly "protect" American workers.
Damaged National Image
For decades, the U.S. has attracted global talent as a "land of opportunity." If it transforms into a country with "high costs, high barriers, and uncertainty," its appeal will decline sharply, and its reputation will be seized by competitors.
III. International Comparison: Others’ Gains, America’s Losses

• Canada: Launched the Global Talent Stream to provide fast-track work visas for tech talent.

• UK & Australia: Revised visa systems to actively recruit high-skilled young professionals.

While the U.S. shuts its doors to talent with exorbitant surcharges, these countries are opening theirs to welcome the global talent that would have otherwise flocked to America.

• China: As the Trump administration takes short-sighted, high-profile steps to exclude global talent, the Chinese government has acted with foresight, quickly introducing the new K Visa to attract young high-tech professionals worldwide.

IV. Conclusion: A Short-Sighted "Killing the Goose That Lays the Golden Eggs"
The Trump administration’s $100,000 H-1B surcharge may boost revenue and win votes in the short term, but in the long run, it is a policy of "killing the goose that lays the golden eggs":

• It weakens America’s appeal to global talent;

• It undermines the U.S. innovation ecosystem and economic vitality;

• It shakes the "talent dividend" that has long been the cornerstone of America’s global leadership.

America’s strength today is inseparable from the efforts and contributions of immigrants from around the world. A truly powerful America has never relied on building walls or erecting barriers, but on attracting and integrating the world’s best talent. The H-1B visa has long served as an effective tool for the U.S. to attract – or even "harvest" – global talent, but now it is being weaponized for political purposes. Restricting talent inflow may earn temporary applause, but it will ultimately cost the U.S. its competitive edge on the global stage. If this short-sighted approach is not corrected promptly, the U.S. will gradually fall far behind other nations in fierce international competition. This is not alarmism. Time will tell.
Disclaimer: This commentary reflects the personal views of Attorney Xie and does not represent the position of XIE LAW OFFICES,LLC.